top of page
NEWS & INSIGHTS
Dec 5, 20234 min read
Dec 5, 20232 min read


Nov 17, 20231 min read


Oct 11, 20231 min read


Oct 2, 20234 min read


Sep 21, 20231 min read
Aug 2, 20234 min read
Jul 6, 20232 min read
Jun 29, 20232 min read


Jun 28, 20231 min read
Jun 26, 20232 min read
Jun 22, 20233 min read


Jun 13, 20231 min read
Jun 12, 20231 min read
Jun 1, 20231 min read
May 2, 20231 min read


Apr 26, 20231 min read
Apr 26, 20231 min read
Apr 21, 20231 min read


Mar 21, 20232 min read


Court of Appeal refuses renewed sentence application but corrects an unlawful sentence: R v Amaaz
On 16 October 2026 the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), comprising Lord Justice Jeremy Baker, Mr Justice Bryan and Mr Justice Dexter Dias, heard the renewed application of Mohammed Fahir Amaaz for leave to appeal against a total sentence of 42 months. Mr Amaaz was 19 at conviction. The offences arose from an incident in which he was found to have assaulted two police officers, together with a separate offence against a civilian. Leave had been refused on the papers by Lad
Imran Khan and Partners


Paralegals – Human Rights, Civil liberties and Public Law Department
We are seeking to recruit paralegals/caseworkers to join our successful team which is highly regarded and rated as a national leader in all aspects of human rights, civil liberties and public law. Main Duties and Responsibilities: The role will consist of assisting the fee earners in the team with case preparation, including administrative tasks, legal research, client liaison, drafting statements, processing evidence, collating and ordering documentation / evidence, at
Imran Khan and Partners


Success in Civil Claim Arising from the Terrorism Act
Daniel Lemberger Cooper, Partner, and Patrick Dunne, solicitor, acted for X in connection with an action for damages arising from their arrest and detention under paragraph 18 of Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000, and a subsequent search under warrant. The Claimant alleged that each period of arrest and detention was unlawful, including that the Defendants’ actions constituted discrimination on the basis of their political beliefs and/or unjustified interference with the
Imran Khan and Partners
bottom of page

